Gemini's stock is down 89%: the crypto IPO winter is real

The stock of Gemini Space Station, the exchange run by the Winklevoss twins, has collapsed 89 percent from its $37 opening trade last September to just $4.19 on July 7, and it is not an outlier: most major digital-asset listings since mid-2025 now trade well below where they debuted. The signal is uncomfortable for the industry's "crypto is going mainstream" narrative: buying crypto and buying the companies that sell crypto have turned out to be very different bets.

• An 89 percent drawdown. From a $37 debut to $4.19, Gemini's equity has lost nearly all of its listing-day value in under a year.
• It is a pattern, not one bad ticker. Major crypto listings since mid-2025 are broadly trading below their opening prices, pointing at the category rather than the company.
• Crypto prices held up better than crypto stocks. Bitcoin and Ethereum recovered through a "green July" even as the exchanges' equities sank, a real divergence.
• The IPO window that opened in 2025 has effectively frozen. Weak aftermarket performance chills the next wave of crypto companies eyeing public markets.

What went wrong with Gemini's stock specifically?

The collapse is less about a single scandal and more about the arithmetic of a listing that priced for a bull market that did not persist. Gemini went public into the enthusiasm of late 2025, when crypto sentiment and prices were near highs, and public-market investors paid a debut valuation that assumed the good times would compound. When crypto had its worst month in four years in June and the froth came out of the sector, the equity had nowhere to go but down, because it had been priced on momentum rather than durable earnings. An exchange's revenue is tightly levered to trading volume and prices, so when the market cools, the business the stock represents shrinks faster than the tokens it lists.

RelatedCircle wins US trust-bank approval for its stablecoin

Why are crypto stocks falling while crypto recovered?

This is the divergence worth understanding. Through early July, Bitcoin and Ethereum staged a "green July" rebound, ETF inflows returned, and coins recovered ground lost in June, yet the equities of the companies that sell access to those coins kept sliding. The reason is that a token and an exchange stock are exposed to different things. Owning Bitcoin is a bet on the asset. Owning an exchange is a bet on trading activity, fee margins, competition, regulation, and management, all of which can deteriorate even as the underlying asset price recovers. When listings were priced at peak sentiment, the equities had further to fall and less fundamental support, so a modest coin recovery was nowhere near enough to rescue a stock that debuted on hype.

What does it mean for the market?

The signal for investors is that the crypto IPO window that cracked open in 2025 has effectively frozen, and that has knock-on effects. When the highest-profile recent listings are trading at a fraction of their debut, the next cohort of crypto companies weighing a public offering faces a brutal comparison set and skittish bankers, so expect delays and down-round pricing. It also sharpens a distinction serious investors already knew: crypto-native equities like Coinbase (COIN) and the newer exchange listings are leveraged plays on sentiment and volume, not clean proxies for the price of Bitcoin. The read-through is that "crypto is going mainstream" and "crypto companies are good public-market investments" are separate claims, and the second one is being repriced hard. The counter-case is cyclical: exchange stocks are volume-levered in both directions, so a genuine bull market would lift them faster than the coins, which is exactly why some investors are circling the wreckage.

Is this the whole crypto-equity story?

No, and it is worth being precise. Not every crypto-linked stock is a Gemini; stablecoin issuers, custodians, and infrastructure players have different revenue models and have held up unevenly. The specific carnage is concentrated in exchanges and trading-venue listings that went public at peak sentiment, where the combination of hype pricing and volume-levered economics did the most damage. But the breadth of the underperformance, most major listings since mid-2025 below their opening prices, means this is not a handful of bad names, it is the market re-rating an entire vintage of offerings. That is the definition of an IPO winter, and it tends to persist until either a durable bull market returns or a new crop of listings resets expectations at more sober valuations.

RelatedSwift and 17 banks pilot tokenized-asset settlement

Our take

Gemini's chart is a clean lesson in a distinction the last cycle blurred: the price of crypto and the value of crypto businesses are not the same trade, and pricing an exchange stock on peak sentiment is how you end up down 89 percent while the underlying asset recovers. The divergence is the tell. Coins rebounded, ETFs took in money, and the equities still sank, because a listing that debuted on momentum had no fundamental floor to catch it. None of this says crypto is dead, the asset class did the opposite in July, but it is a hard reminder that a busted IPO is a busted IPO regardless of sector, and that the companies selling picks and shovels in a gold rush are levered to the rush, not the gold. The window is not reopening until either the volume comes back for real or the next listings show up priced for reality instead of hope.

Original analysis by GenZTech. Market data via The Block.