Microsoft Open-Sources Comic Chat After 30 Years

Microsoft open-sourced Comic Chat, the 1996 IRC client that drew your conversations as comic strips, publishing the source under an MIT license at github.com/microsoft/comic-chat. The announcement went up on the Microsoft Open Source Blog this morning, written by Principal Program Manager Robert Standefer with Scott Hanselman. The nostalgia headline writes itself, but the genuinely interesting part is buried three paragraphs down: Microsoft shipped AI-assisted attempts to make thirty-year-old C++ compile again, and left the receipts in the repo.

• The release covers the full development history, from an August 1996 pre-release snapshot through the 2.5 beta of June 1998, plus the SDK, documentation, a Java client called JChat, and internal design docs.
• It is MIT licensed and framed explicitly as a historical artifact rather than a maintained product. Microsoft is not restarting Comic Chat.
• Alongside the originals sit "modern" folders: forks that build the Visual C++ 4.0 MFC code in Visual Studio 2022, add DPI-aware rendering, fix IRC connectivity, and offer optional native TLS.
• Comic Chat is where Comic Sans found its first real home. Vincent Connare drew the typeface in 1994; Comic Chat shipped it to the world in 1996 with Internet Explorer 3.

What exactly did Microsoft release?

Not a teaser, and not a single tidy snapshot. The repository carries parallel version folders, each a preserved point in time. v1.0-pre/client holds an August 1996 pre-release build labelled "rup 206 Beta 2". v1.0 is the shipping 1996 release. v2.1b dates to February 1998 and v2.5-beta-1 to June 1998; both add an IRC protocol layer, OLE automation, and the Art Pack 1 character set on top of the original cast. An artifacts folder from January 1998 collects the SDK, companion tools, the JChat Java client, the Betty Bot sample, xcchat, and documentation. A file literally named file dates.txt preserves the original timestamps.

RelatedDebian 13.6 Ships a Fix for the Expired Secure Boot CA

The language breakdown is a small time capsule of its own: 63.3% C++, 13.2% HTML, 9.8% C, 5.1% Visual Basic 6.0, 3.8% RTF, and 3.4% Java. The original build instructions ask for Visual C++ 4.x and MFC 4.x on Windows 95 or NT 4.0, a 486, 8 MB of RAM, and 256-color video, driven by NMAKE /f "chat.mak". That is the honest artifact, warts intact.

How did Comic Chat actually work?

David "DJ" Kurlander conceived it in 1995 inside the Microsoft Research Virtual Worlds Group and built it with Visual C++ 4.0 and MFC. Kurlander, Tim Skelly, and David Salesin presented the technology at SIGGRAPH '96, which tells you it was a graphics research result and not a skin over an IRC socket.

The trick was that Comic Chat treated a line of text as a director's brief. It read conversational cues, punctuation, emoticons, and phrasing, then chose the character's pose, facial expression, and gesture, then decided panel size, panel order, and where the speech balloons went. Type "I like that" and your character might point at itself. Every message triggered a chain of small editorial decisions, which is exactly what Fig 1 lays out. The artwork came from Jim Woodring, an independent comic artist, and the team's feasibility test was blunt: they handed him real chat transcripts and asked him to illustrate them.

It worked well enough to be localized into 24 languages and bundled with Windows 98. For a research demo about talking cartoon heads, that is a remarkable distance travelled.

Why does the AI modernization angle matter?

This is the part most coverage will skip. Microsoft did not just dump the tarball. It included what the blog calls "a few AI-powered modernization attempts": experiments in getting 1990s C++ and MFC to build under current Visual Studio, connect to modern IRC servers, and render legibly on high-DPI displays. The v1.0-pre-modern and v2.5-beta-1-modern folders are the output.

The changes are specific and unglamorous, which is what makes them credible. The 2.5 modern fork replaces the NT DDK BUILD.EXE system with an nmake makefile, adds a Common Controls v6 manifest, runs DPI-unaware deliberately so scaling stays uniform, fixes mouse-wheel scrolling and balloon word-wrap, and short-circuits the long-dead Microsoft art-download servers in favour of bundled art. A manual GitHub Actions workflow builds both clients and publishes SHA-256 hashes under a release tagged unofficial-modern-builds-2026-07.

Microsoft is careful to call these "not polished re-releases," just worked examples. That hedge is doing real work. What is actually on display is a repeatable pattern for legacy revival: take dead code, point a model at the build errors, document the diff, ship the attempt as an artifact rather than a product. If that pattern holds, the constraint on software preservation stops being "can anyone still read MFC" and starts being "who owns the art."

RelatedSvelteKit Ships Breaking API Changes: Sync Requests, refreshAll

Who is this actually for?

Three groups, and it is worth being honest that none of them is "people who want to chat." If you want to run Comic Chat today, the repo points you at existing community builds or its own unofficial modern release rather than pretending you should compile it yourself.

The first group is preservationists, who now have the primary source instead of circulating abandonware binaries of uncertain provenance. The second is graphics and HCI people, because the SIGGRAPH '96 idea of deriving staging from text is suddenly topical again in an era of generated avatars and agent interfaces. The third is anyone maintaining a decades-old C++ codebase, for whom docs/MODERNIZATION.md is a free case study in what it costs to make old MFC breathe.

1. 1994Vincent Connare draws Comic Sans a typeface looking for a product
2. 1995Kurlander starts Comic Chat in MS Research Virtual Worlds Group, VC++ 4.0 and MFC
3. Aug 1996v1.0 ships with Internet Explorer 3 SIGGRAPH '96 paper the same year
4. 1998v2.5 beta; bundled with Windows 98 localized into 24 languages
5. 16 Jul 2026Full source published under MIT plus AI-assisted modern builds
6. NextCommunity forks and art licensing clarity the open question

Our take

Open-sourcing Comic Chat costs Microsoft nothing and buys a lot of goodwill, so cynicism is available if you want it. We think that reading is too cheap. The care in this release is visible in the details that no marketing team would ask for: preserved file timestamps, a pre-release beta nobody needed, an honest label of "not polished re-releases" on the modern builds, and documentation of what broke. That is what someone does when they care about the artifact rather than the announcement.

The Comic Sans lineage will drive the jokes, and fine. The durable point is smaller and better. In 1996 a research team asked what a chat client would look like if it made editorial decisions about your words, shipped the answer to millions of people, and then it vanished into abandonware for a generation because the art servers went dark. Thirty years on, the code builds again. That is preservation working, and it is a decent argument for opening the archive before the people who remember why it mattered retire.

Original analysis by GenZTech. Source: Microsoft Open Source Blog