Helium, the decentralized wireless network once defined by unmet IoT ambitions, has found genuine product-market fit by pivoting to mobile: daily active users climbed to as much as 2.5 million in late 2025, and seven carriers now route data through its community-built hotspots, with offloading running up to 80% cheaper than traditional roaming. It is the clearest example yet of a DePIN network graduating from token-fueled speculation to a real business that carriers pay to use.

  • Helium Mobile daily active users reached as much as 2.5 million in late 2025, roughly a 10x jump in a year.
  • Seven carriers now connect and offload data through Helium hotspots, including partnerships with AT&T and Telefónica/Movistar.
  • Carrier offloading via Helium can be up to 80% cheaper than roaming and avoids heavy upfront network capex.
  • The original IoT vision underdelivered; the community hotspot buildout became coverage augmentation for mobile carriers instead.
Helium Mobile daily active users growth Daily active users grew roughly tenfold over a year to as much as 2.5 million in late 2025. ~0.25M~2.5M late 2024late 2025 Helium Mobile daily active users (~10x growth) genztech.blog
Fig 1 · data The pivot in one chart: Helium Mobile daily active users grew roughly tenfold in a year to as much as 2.5 million by late 2025, the traction the original IoT vision never reached.

What changed for Helium?

It stopped chasing IoT and started serving mobile carriers. Helium launched on a vision of a decentralized network of hotspots for Internet-of-Things devices, but the demand for that IoT connectivity never matched the enormous community deployment of hardware. The pivot reframed all those hotspots as coverage augmentation for mobile networks: instead of connecting sensors, they offload phone data traffic, and carriers pay for the capacity. That reframing found real product-market fit, with daily active users climbing to as much as 2.5 million and sign-ups nearing 600,000 by the end of 2025. The hardware the community already built became useful for a job it was not originally sold for, which is a more honest and durable outcome than the original pitch.

RelatedDePIN's real revenue hits $150M a month on-chain

There is a broader lesson in that reversal. A lot of crypto infrastructure was built ambition-first, with hardware deployed against demand that had not yet materialized. Helium is unusual in that its oversupply of hotspots turned out to have a second, unplanned use, and management was willing to abandon the founding story to chase it. Most projects cannot pivot because their hardware is too specialized; Helium could because coverage is coverage.

Why do carriers actually pay for this?

Because the economics are compelling. Building and maintaining wireless coverage is enormously capital-intensive, and roaming, paying another network to carry your customers' traffic, is expensive. Helium offers offloading that can be up to 80% cheaper than traditional roaming, and it lets carriers extend coverage without the heavy upfront capex of building it themselves. That is why seven carriers now connect through Helium's hotspots, with named partnerships including AT&T in the US and Telefónica/Movistar in Mexico. The demand is real business demand, carriers reducing costs, not token speculation, which is exactly the transition DePIN skeptics said these networks would never make.

How this fits the DePIN shift to real revenue

The dominant story in DePIN this year is the move from token-emission incentives to actual fee revenue, and Helium is a headline example. Leading DePIN networks generated roughly $150 million in on-chain revenue in a single month in early 2026, paid by real customers for storage, compute, mapping and connectivity. The networks that survive are the ones converting from paying operators in inflationary tokens to paying them from end-user fees, and Helium's carrier deals are precisely that kind of durable, fee-based demand. It also helped that the SEC's lawsuit against Nova Labs, Helium's core contributor, was resolved, removing a regulatory overhang that had shadowed the project. Notably, token prices have lagged this operational progress: HNT and peers are down sharply from a year ago even as usage climbs, a divergence worth understanding before drawing conclusions from price alone.

RelatedFilecoin Bets Its Future on a Verifiable Onchain Cloud

What to watch next

What to watch · 2026
  • Revenue durability. User growth is real; the question is whether carrier-paid revenue keeps compounding or plateaus.
  • More carrier deals. Seven carriers is real traction. New named partnerships would confirm the offload model scales.
  • Token versus usage gap. HNT has lagged usage badly. Whether fee revenue eventually pulls the token up is the open question.
  • Incumbent competition. Amazon Sidewalk and traditional carriers can build their own offload. Helium's cost edge has to hold.

Our take

Helium is the DePIN turnaround worth taking seriously, because it did the hard, unglamorous thing: it admitted the original vision was not working and repurposed its assets for a job people actually pay for. Carrier data offloading at up to 80% below roaming is a genuine value proposition, seven carriers and 2.5 million daily users are genuine traction, and revenue that comes from carriers rather than token emissions is exactly the fee-based model DePIN needs to prove. The honest caveat is the token: HNT has badly lagged the operational progress, so this is a story about a network finding product-market fit, not a claim about price. But if you want evidence that decentralized physical infrastructure can graduate from speculation to a real business, Helium's carrier pivot is the strongest case on the board.

Primary sources

Original analysis by GenZTech. Figures current as of July 2026.